top of page
  • Writer's pictureplowmanchambers

Court of First Instance handed down judgment in the first petition brought by the SFC under s.214 of the Securities and Futures Ordinance, refusing to make any compensation order

Updated: Jun 17

7 May 2020 -- In SFC v Wong Wai Kwong and Ors [2020] 3 HKLRD 604 ; [2020] 3 HKLRD 664 after trial the Hon Coleman J refused to make any compensation order (originally sought by the SFC in the sum of over HK$2billion) against the former directors of Egana Goldpfeil (Holdings) Ltd (Stock Code: 048) (in Liquidation) ("Egana"), although disqualificaiton orders were made ranging from 6-9 years. 


This was the first petition brought by the SFC under s.214 of the Securities and Futures Ordinance.  The SFC alleged a large-scale misapplication of funds which gave rise to doubtful receivables over HK$2.5billion, and that the former directors were responsible to make a compensation covering those losses. 


Tony Ko acted for the 3rd Respondent, a former director of Egana.  The judgment can be found here.

Comments


bottom of page